Advertisement
DBRG vs MLP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DBRG is a Buy and MLP is a StrongBuy.
DBRG | MLP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DBRG's Valuation (92) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MLP (98) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that DBRG’s stock grew similarly to MLP’s over the last 12 months.
MLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as DBRG (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MLP’s stock grew similarly to DBRG’s over the last 12 months.
DBRG's SMR Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLP (94) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that DBRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLP’s over the last 12 months.
DBRG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MLP (57) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that DBRG’s stock grew similarly to MLP’s over the last 12 months.
MLP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBRG (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MLP’s stock grew significantly faster than DBRG’s over the last 12 months.
| DBRG | MLP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DBRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DBRG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DBRG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DBRG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DBRG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while MLP (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.52%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
DBRG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Real Estate Development (-2.73% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BULG | 33.38 | 1.16 | +3.59% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long BULL Daily ETF (BULG) | |||
| DTCR | 27.31 | -0.03 | -0.11% |
| Global X Data Center And Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) | |||
| SFEB | 25.77 | -0.07 | -0.27% |
| FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) | |||
| DECZ | 43.91 | -0.35 | -0.80% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) | |||
| DDLS | 45.22 | -0.50 | -1.09% |
| WisdomTree Dynamic International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) | |||
MLP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLP has been loosely correlated with AGNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLP jumps, then AGNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLP | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| AGNT - MLP | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| DBRG - MLP | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| ARL - MLP | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.33% | ||
| NMRK - MLP | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| MMI - MLP | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||