Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$31.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.54B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. DCCIX (6.54B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (0.82) vs DCCIX (0.58). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (27 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. DCCIX (2.01). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 59.65 vs. DCCIX (38.43).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.369 | 13.186 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.54B | 28.4B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 12.63 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.66 | 55.56 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.43 | 59.65 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.75 | 111.69 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement