Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$31.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.8B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.82
Change+$0.37 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a StrongBuy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. DCCIX (6.81B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (0.84) vs DCCIX (0.58). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (27 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. DCCIX (8.21). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.93 vs. DCCIX (46.13).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.982 | 7.731 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 27.7B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.84 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | 13.29 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.68 | 39.27 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.13 | 61.93 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.70 | 101.99 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement