Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$28.49
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. DCCIX (7.01B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (1.10) vs DCCIX (0.64). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (26 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. DCCIX (2.04). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.48 vs. DCCIX (30.70).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.186 | -5.347 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 24.9B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.10 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 3.21 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.91 | 16.55 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.70 | 45.48 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.64 | 65.10 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement