Ad is loading...
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$27.24
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.73B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$24.81
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. DCCIX (6.73B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (1.16) vs DCCIX (0.67). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (26 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DCCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.92 vs. FSSNX (-2.47). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 55.84 vs. DCCIX (40.55).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3,240% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.661 | -10.658 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 23.7B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.16 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.92 | -2.47 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.97 | 13.21 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.55 | 55.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.16 | 56.80 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...