Ad is loading...
DCCIX vs FSSNX
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs FSSNX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$31.53
Change+$0.09 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.74B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
DCCIX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. DCCIX (7.74B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: FSSNX (1.36) vs DCCIX (0.55). DCCIX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: DCCIX (26 years) vs FSSNX (13 years). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). DCCIX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX (20.08) and DCCIX (19.52) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. DCCIX (31.69).
| DCCIX | FSSNX | DCCIX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.751 | 2.095 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 27.1B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.36 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.52 | 20.08 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.75 | 13.99 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.69 | 40.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.67 | 89.83 | 71% |