Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs NAESX
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$28.49
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.01B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. DCCIX (7.01B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: NAESX (1.35) vs DCCIX (0.64). DCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCIX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. DCCIX (2.04). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.45 vs. DCCIX (30.70).
| DCCIX | NAESX | DCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.186 | -3.929 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.01B | 148B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.35 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 4.88 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.91 | 18.26 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.70 | 52.45 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.64 | 95.90 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement