Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs NAESX
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$30.37
Change-$0.21 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.71B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. DCCIX (6.71B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: NAESX (1.25) vs DCCIX (0.61). DCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. DCCIX (4.24). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 58.12 vs. DCCIX (37.18).
| DCCIX | NAESX | DCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.066 | 2.876 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.71B | 154B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.25 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 9.55 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.92 | 20.84 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | 58.12 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.03 | 113.38 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement