Ad is loading...
DCCIX vs NAESX
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$25.37
Change-$1.13 (-4.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$96.20
Change-$4.90 (-4.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. DCCIX (6.4B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: NAESX (1.39) vs DCCIX (0.65). DCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCIX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCIX (0.84) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). DCCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). DCCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.59 vs. NAESX (-9.21). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 91.51 vs. DCCIX (63.17).
| DCCIX | NAESX | DCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.17 | 494% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.17 | 494% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.519 | -16.384 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 153B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.59 | -9.21 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.72 | -3.54 | 331% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.17 | 91.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.43 | 70.29 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...