Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCCIX vs NAESX
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$31.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.8B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. DCCIX (6.81B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: NAESX (1.20) vs DCCIX (0.58). DCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. DCCIX (8.21). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.43 vs. DCCIX (46.13).
| DCCIX | NAESX | DCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.982 | 5.746 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 161B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | 12.82 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.68 | 38.26 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.13 | 65.43 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.70 | 130.73 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement