Ad is loading...
DCCIX vs NAESX
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCCIX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core I
Price$27.24
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.73B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$105.37
Change+$0.38 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
DCCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCCIX vs. NAESX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. DCCIX (6.73B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCCIX: NAESX (1.43) vs DCCIX (0.67). DCCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCCIX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCCIX (0.81) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.80 vs. DCCIX (-1.92). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 64.48 vs. DCCIX (40.55).
| DCCIX | NAESX | DCCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.661 | -8.744 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.73B | 140B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.43 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.92 | -0.80 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.97 | 14.78 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.55 | 64.48 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.16 | 87.13 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...