Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCEMX vs RNWHX
DCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DCEMX vs RNWHX
DCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. DCEMX (110M). DCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DCEMX (1.65) vs RNWHX (1.14). DCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DCEMX (22 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). DCEMX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). DCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs DCEMX (5000). DCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.59 vs. RNWHX (19.47). DCEMX (14.10) and RNWHX (14.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DCEMX | RNWHX | DCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.626 | 12.651 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.14 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.59 | 19.47 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.87 | 43.67 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.10 | 14.04 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.75 | 107.31 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement