Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCEMX vs RNWHX
DCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DCEMX vs RNWHX
DCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. DCEMX (110M). DCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DCEMX (1.78) vs RNWHX (1.15). DCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DCEMX (22 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). DCEMX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). DCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs DCEMX (5000). DCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.91 vs. RNWHX (17.19). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.68 vs. DCEMX (13.55).
| DCEMX | RNWHX | DCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.543 | 16.447 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 90B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.15 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.91 | 17.19 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.02 | 53.84 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.55 | 17.68 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.13 | 111.44 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement