Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCEMX vs RNWHX
DCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DCEMX vs RNWHX
DCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. DCEMX (119M). DCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DCEMX (1.67) vs RNWHX (1.15). DCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DCEMX (22 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). DCEMX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). DCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs DCEMX (5000). DCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.50 vs. RNWHX (31.15). DCEMX (20.22) and RNWHX (20.21) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DCEMX | RNWHX | DCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.72 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.168 | 18.743 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.50 | 31.15 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.48 | 57.37 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.22 | 20.21 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.04 | 132.48 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers