DCNNF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.13M
FPRGF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.8M
Ad is loading...

DCNNF vs FPRGF

Header iconDCNNF vs FPRGF Comparison
Open Charts DCNNF vs FPRGFBanner chart's image
QUEST CRITICAL METALS
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$7.22K
Capitalization2.13M
Falco Resources
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization33.8M
DCNNF vs FPRGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCNNF vs. FPRGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCNNF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (DCNNF: $0.05 vs. FPRGF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: DCNNF and FPRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCNNF: 11% vs. FPRGF: 5%
Market capitalization -- DCNNF: $2.13M vs. FPRGF: $33.8M
DCNNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.13M. FPRGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCNNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DCNNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the long-term than DCNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCNNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPRGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCNNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FPRGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DCNNF is a better buy in the short-term than FPRGF.

Price Growth

DCNNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -14.65% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than DCNNF($2.13M). FPRGF YTD gains are higher at: -13.368 vs. DCNNF (-25.929).
DCNNFFPRGFDCNNF / FPRGF
Capitalization2.13M33.8M6%
EBITDAN/A-2.32M-
Gain YTD-25.929-13.368194%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A6.78M-
Total DebtN/A32.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCNNF vs FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
DCNNF
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPRGF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (64). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (65). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DCNNF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to DCNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCNNFFPRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DCNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPA119.510.81
+0.68%
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
XC30.950.12
+0.38%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
JCPI47.020.15
+0.33%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
MUSI43.37N/A
N/A
American Century Multisector Income ETF
GMUN49.29N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bd ETF

DCNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DCNNF has been loosely correlated with HTRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DCNNF jumps, then HTRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCNNF
1D Price
Change %
DCNNF100%
N/A
HTRC - DCNNF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LTRBF - DCNNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - DCNNF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
BHSIF - DCNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
FPRGF - DCNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+11.29%
More

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
+11.29%
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGLLF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIDF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More