DCNSF
Price
$7.32
Change
-$0.18 (-2.40%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
LNC
Price
$34.82
Change
-$0.15 (-0.43%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.42B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DCNSF vs LNC

Header iconDCNSF vs LNC Comparison
Open Charts DCNSF vs LNCBanner chart's image
Dai-ichi Life Holdings
Price$7.32
Change-$0.18 (-2.40%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization20.38B
Lincoln National
Price$34.82
Change-$0.15 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization5.42B
DCNSF vs LNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DCNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DCNSF vs. LNC commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCNSF is a Hold and LNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DCNSF: $7.32 vs. LNC: $34.77)
Brand notoriety: DCNSF: Not notable vs. LNC: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DCNSF: 367% vs. LNC: 72%
Market capitalization -- DCNSF: $20.38B vs. LNC: $5.42B
DCNSF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $20.38B. LNC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $5.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DCNSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DCNSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DCNSF and LNC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DCNSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DCNSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNC is a better buy in the short-term than DCNSF.

Price Growth

DCNSF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.80% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DCNSF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than LNC($5.42B). DCNSF has higher P/E ratio than LNC: DCNSF (14.14) vs LNC (9.80). LNC YTD gains are higher at: 12.781 vs. DCNSF (8.446). DCNSF has more cash in the bank: 1.79T vs. LNC (23B). LNC has less debt than DCNSF: LNC (5.95B) vs DCNSF (964B). DCNSF has higher revenues than LNC: DCNSF (9.09T) vs LNC (11.7B).
DCNSFLNCDCNSF / LNC
Capitalization20.4B5.42B377%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.44612.78166%
P/E Ratio14.149.80144%
Revenue9.09T11.7B77,701%
Total Cash1.79T23B7,796%
Total Debt964B5.95B16,204%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DCNSF vs LNC: Fundamental Ratings
DCNSF
LNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8137
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNC's Valuation (12) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as DCNSF (35) in the null industry. This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

DCNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that DCNSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's SMR Rating (97) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as DCNSF (100) in the null industry. This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as DCNSF (52) in the null industry. This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCNSF (81) in the null industry. This means that LNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DCNSFLNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DCNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INOD50.132.19
+4.57%
Innodata
MPB30.220.73
+2.48%
Mid Penn Bancorp
CHSCO26.250.04
+0.15%
CHS
PRT4.02-0.04
-0.99%
PermRock Royalty Trust Trust
WFG76.46-0.88
-1.14%
West Fraser Timber Co Ltd

DCNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DCNSF and BHF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DCNSF and BHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCNSF
1D Price
Change %
DCNSF100%
N/A
BHF - DCNSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
PUK - DCNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
LNC - DCNSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
AAIGF - DCNSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
FG - DCNSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

LNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNC
1D Price
Change %
LNC100%
-0.57%
PRU - LNC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
MET - LNC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
JXN - LNC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
BHF - LNC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
CNO - LNC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
More