Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDDAX vs FSMDX
DDDAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DDDAX vs FSMDX
DDDAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDDAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDDAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. DDDAX (116M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DDDAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs DDDAX (0.00). DDDAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DDDAX (15 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DDDAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DDDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDDAX: FSMDX (0) vs DDDAX (2500). DDDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. FSMDX (20.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.77 vs. DDDAX (-8.42).
| DDDAX | FSMDX | DDDAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.03 | 7,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.03 | 7,040% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.165 | 15.326 | 216% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 53.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 20.14 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.33 | 55.87 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.42 | 43.77 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.69 | 174.44 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers