DDDAX
Price
$25.98
Change
+$0.32 (+1.25%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
108.71M
FSMDX
Price
$43.29
Change
+$0.44 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
53.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DDDAX vs FSMDX

DDDAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 26.61B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 108.71M to 53.11B. FSMDX holds the highest valuation in this group at 53.11B. The lowest valued company is DDDAX at 108.71M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -3%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -2%, and the average quarterly price growth was 18%. FSMDX experienced the highest price growth at -2%, while DDDAX experienced the biggest fall at -4%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
DDDAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDDAX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. DDDAX (109M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DDDAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs DDDAX (0.00). DDDAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DDDAX (15 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DDDAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DDDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDDAX: FSMDX (0) vs DDDAX (2500). DDDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.11 vs. FSMDX (18.23). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. DDDAX (-10.53).
DDDAXFSMDXDDDAX / FSMDX
Total Expense Ratio1.760.037,040%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio1.760.037,040%
Fund Existence15 years15 years-
Gain YTD29.33516.030183%
Front Load6%N/A-
Min. Initial Investment25000-
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets109M53.1B0%
Annual Yield % from dividends0.000.75-
Returns for 1 year25.1118.23138%
Returns for 3 years26.3455.8347%
Returns for 5 years-10.5340.07-26%
Returns for 10 years55.40163.5234%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCZX28.53N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Small Company Z
SMEFX20.58N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Equity R6
VIHAX51.20N/A
N/A
Vanguard Intl Hi Div Yld Adm
ETAEX17.23N/A
N/A
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
GCBUX37.91N/A
N/A
Green Century Balanced Institutional