Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDDCX vs FSMDX
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DDDCX vs FSMDX
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDDCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDDCX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. DDDCX (114M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DDDCX: FSMDX (0.99) vs DDDCX (0.00). DDDCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DDDCX (13 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DDDCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DDDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDDCX: FSMDX (0) vs DDDCX (2500). DDDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.00 vs. FSMDX (22.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. DDDCX (-17.25).
| DDDCX | FSMDX | DDDCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.691 | 11.996 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.00 | 22.46 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 59.36 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.25 | 42.72 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.12 | 166.70 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement