Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDDCX vs FSMDX
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DDDCX vs FSMDX
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDDCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDDCX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. DDDCX (106M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DDDCX: FSMDX (0.75) vs DDDCX (0.00). DDDCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DDDCX (14 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DDDCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DDDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDDCX: FSMDX (0) vs DDDCX (2500). DDDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.10 vs. FSMDX (13.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. DDDCX (-15.03).
| DDDCX | FSMDX | DDDCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.635 | 13.837 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 53.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 13.26 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.30 | 56.18 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.03 | 40.31 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.78 | 167.00 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers