Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDDCX vs FSMDX
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DDDCX vs FSMDX
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDDCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDDCX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. DDDCX (115M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DDDCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs DDDCX (0.00). DDDCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DDDCX (14 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DDDCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DDDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDDCX: FSMDX (0) vs DDDCX (2500). DDDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.08 vs. FSMDX (19.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. DDDCX (-11.05).
| DDDCX | FSMDX | DDDCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.855 | 14.947 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 53.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.08 | 19.67 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.51 | 52.50 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.05 | 45.89 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.53 | 165.79 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement