Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDFRX vs RMEBX
DDFRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts DDFRX vs RMEBX
DDFRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDFRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDFRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. DDFRX (10.3B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than DDFRX: RMEBX (1.04) vs DDFRX (0.96). DDFRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: DDFRX (21 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). DDFRX (1.08) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . DDFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDFRX: RMEBX (250) vs DDFRX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. DDFRX (4.86). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. DDFRX (-11.49).
| DDFRX | RMEBX | DDFRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.07 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.07 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.705 | 5.801 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 115B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.86 | 9.98 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.19 | 34.14 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.49 | 32.93 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.24 | 89.84 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement