Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDIAX vs FBAFX
DDIAX vs FBAFX Comparison
Open Charts DDIAX vs FBAFX
DDIAX vs FBAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. DDIAX (833M). DDIAX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: DDIAX (3.05) vs FBAFX (1.99). DDIAX was incepted earlier than FBAFX: DDIAX (30 years) vs FBAFX (6 years). DDIAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). DDIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDIAX: FBAFX (250) vs DDIAX (1000). DDIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.48 vs. FBAFX (18.03). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.92 vs. DDIAX (21.22).
| DDIAX | FBAFX | DDIAX / FBAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.33 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.33 | 339% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.027 | 9.797 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 1.99 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.48 | 18.03 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.15 | 46.61 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.22 | 38.92 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement