Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDIAX vs RLBFX
DDIAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts DDIAX vs RLBFX
Macquarie Wealth Builder A
Price$15.63
Change+$0.12 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.9M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.55
Change+$0.32 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.74B
DDIAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDIAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDIAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. DDIAX (837M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than DDIAX: RLBFX (2.08) vs DDIAX (1.46). DDIAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: DDIAX (29 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). DDIAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). DDIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDIAX: RLBFX (250) vs DDIAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.85 vs. DDIAX (5.51). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. DDIAX (28.46).
| DDIAX | RLBFX | DDIAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.29 | 366% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.351 | 10.009 | 63% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 10.85 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 30.92 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.46 | 39.87 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.23 | 69.62 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement