Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDIIX vs FBAFX
DDIIX vs FBAFX Comparison
Open Charts DDIIX vs FBAFX
DDIIX vs FBAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. DDIIX (823M). DDIIX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: DDIIX (3.29) vs FBAFX (1.99). DDIIX was incepted earlier than FBAFX: DDIIX (30 years) vs FBAFX (6 years). DDIIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). DDIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). DDIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBAFX: DDIIX (0) vs FBAFX (250). DDIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.36 vs. FBAFX (17.01). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. DDIIX (22.69).
| DDIIX | FBAFX | DDIIX / FBAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.33 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.33 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.946 | 9.481 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 823M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 1.99 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.36 | 17.01 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.88 | 45.41 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.69 | 39.61 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement