DECK
Price
$105.81
Change
-$0.02 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
24.16B
49 days until earnings call
WWW
Price
$16.88
Change
+$0.23 (+1.38%)
Updated
Jun 5, 10:45 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
862.24M
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DECK vs WWW

Header iconDECK vs WWW Comparison
Open Charts DECK vs WWWBanner chart's image
Deckers Outdoor
Price$105.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
Volume$2.55M
Capitalization24.16B
Wolverine World Wide
Price$16.88
Change+$0.23 (+1.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization862.24M
DECK vs WWW Comparison Chart
Loading...
DECK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DECK vs. WWW commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DECK is a Buy and WWW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (DECK: $105.81 vs. WWW: $16.65)
Brand notoriety: DECK and WWW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DECK: 71% vs. WWW: 55%
Market capitalization -- DECK: $24.16B vs. WWW: $862.24M
DECK [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $24.16B. WWW’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $862.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DECK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWWW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DECK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WWW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWW is a better buy in the long-term than DECK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DECK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DECK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WWW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DECK is a better buy in the short-term than WWW.

Price Growth

DECK (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while WWW (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -3.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

DECK is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

WWW is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (-1.45% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DECK($24.2B) has a higher market cap than WWW($862M). DECK has higher P/E ratio than WWW: DECK (33.63) vs WWW (8.10). WWW YTD gains are higher at: -24.115 vs. DECK (-47.900). DECK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 986M vs. WWW (-35.6M). DECK has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. WWW (179M). DECK has less debt than WWW: DECK (274M) vs WWW (1.09B). DECK has higher revenues than WWW: DECK (4.12B) vs WWW (2.24B).
DECKWWWDECK / WWW
Capitalization24.2B862M2,807%
EBITDA986M-35.6M-2,770%
Gain YTD-47.900-24.115199%
P/E Ratio33.638.10415%
Revenue4.12B2.24B184%
Total Cash1.65B179M922%
Total Debt274M1.09B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DECK vs WWW: Fundamental Ratings
DECK
WWW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
2438
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9686
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWW's Valuation (35) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DECK (89). This means that WWW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DECK’s over the last 12 months.

DECK's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWW (100). This means that DECK’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.

DECK's SMR Rating (24) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as WWW (38). This means that DECK’s stock grew similarly to WWW’s over the last 12 months.

WWW's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DECK (89). This means that WWW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DECK’s over the last 12 months.

WWW's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as DECK (96). This means that WWW’s stock grew similarly to DECK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DECKWWW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DECK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPSPX23.720.05
+0.21%
NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Class A
MDIIX17.82N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Inv A
IRFAX8.96N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers International Realty A
SDGCX84.78N/A
N/A
DWS Capital Growth C
SSEFX12.43N/A
N/A
SouthernSun U.S. Equity, N

DECK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DECK has been loosely correlated with ONON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DECK jumps, then ONON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DECK
1D Price
Change %
DECK100%
-0.02%
ONON - DECK
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
WWW - DECK
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
PVH - DECK
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
CROX - DECK
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
SHOO - DECK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
More

WWW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWW has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWW jumps, then RL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWW
1D Price
Change %
WWW100%
-0.83%
RL - WWW
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
UA - WWW
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
SHOO - WWW
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
UAA - WWW
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
PVH - WWW
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
More