19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
DEEF vs FTS
DEEF vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts DEEF vs FTS
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
Price$28.35
Change+$0.13 (+0.46%)
Volume$1.4K
Net Assets48.42M
DEEF vs FTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEF vs. FTS commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEF is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTS: Fundamental Ratings
FTS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEF | FTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 36% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 74% | 17 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DEEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEF has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEEF jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEF | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| BAM - DEEF | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| ACA - DEEF | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| WDS - DEEF | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| NTR - DEEF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| FTS - DEEF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
FTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with EVRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then EVRG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTS | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| EVRG - FTS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| PPL - FTS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| AVA - FTS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| ACLLF - FTS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| LNT - FTS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
More | ||||