Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWFX
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$25.71
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.29B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.05
Change-$0.22 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. DEMAX (6.29B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: DEMAX (1.36) vs RNWFX (1.04). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.96 vs. RNWFX (15.50). DEMAX (26.81) and RNWFX (25.86) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DEMAX | RNWFX | DEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.62 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.151 | 16.554 | 164% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.29B | 70.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.04 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.96 | 15.50 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.63 | 30.39 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.81 | 25.86 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.59 | 76.31 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers