Ad is loading...
DEMAX vs RNWFX
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$20.48
Change-$0.70 (-3.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.3B
American Funds New World R5
Price$77.31
Change-$1.87 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. DEMAX (5.3B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: DEMAX (1.69) vs RNWFX (1.17). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.34 vs. RNWFX (-1.48). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.82 vs. RNWFX (50.78).
| DEMAX | RNWFX | DEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.62 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.748 | 0.065 | 7,337% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 62.3B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.17 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | -1.48 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.20 | 0.31 | 1,049% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.82 | 50.78 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.75 | 42.27 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...