Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWFX
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWFX
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. DEMAX (16.9B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: DEMAX (7.76) vs RNWFX (1.20). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMAX (30 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). DEMAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DEMAX (5.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 242.56 vs. RNWFX (31.39). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 240.38 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| DEMAX | RNWFX | DEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.62 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 134.604 | 18.794 | 716% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 90.9B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.76 | 1.20 | 649% |
| Returns for 1 year | 242.56 | 31.39 | 773% |
| Returns for 3 years | 391.72 | 58.06 | 675% |
| Returns for 5 years | 240.38 | 20.98 | 1,145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 637.14 | 135.60 | 470% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement