Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$26.57
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.45
Change+$0.90 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. DEMAX (6.56B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (1.56) vs RNWHX (1.04). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.56 vs. RNWHX (11.19). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.99 vs. RNWHX (35.11).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.405 | 15.036 | 209% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.56B | 69B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.04 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.56 | 11.19 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.42 | 35.35 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.99 | 35.11 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement