Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$30.22
Change+$0.45 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.16B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.10
Change+$0.23 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. DEMAX (7.16B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (1.36) vs RNWHX (0.97). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.05 vs. RNWHX (17.66). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.31 vs. RNWHX (32.18).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 47.230 | 23.783 | 199% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.16B | 74.1B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.97 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.05 | 17.66 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.79 | 49.13 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.31 | 32.18 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers