Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$25.71
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.29B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.55
Change-$0.22 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. DEMAX (6.29B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (1.36) vs RNWHX (1.00). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.96 vs. RNWHX (15.33). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.81 vs. RNWHX (25.21).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.151 | 16.483 | 165% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.29B | 70.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.00 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.96 | 15.33 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.63 | 30.04 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.81 | 25.21 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.59 | N/A | - |