Ad is loading...
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$20.61
Change+$0.17 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$76.98
Change+$1.06 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.7B
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 60.7B vs. DEMAX (5.12B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (1.69) vs RNWHX (1.12). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. DEMAX (-1.71). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 36.18 vs. DEMAX (32.40).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.039 | -0.132 | 790% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.12B | 60.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.12 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.71 | 0.40 | -424% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.48 | 9.93 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.40 | 36.18 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers