Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. DEMAX (16.9B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (7.76) vs RNWHX (1.15). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (30 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). DEMAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DEMAX (5.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 242.56 vs. RNWHX (31.15). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 240.38 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.72 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.72 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 134.604 | 18.743 | 718% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 90.9B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.76 | 1.15 | 676% |
| Returns for 1 year | 242.56 | 31.15 | 779% |
| Returns for 3 years | 391.72 | 57.37 | 683% |
| Returns for 5 years | 240.38 | 20.21 | 1,189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 637.14 | 132.48 | 481% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement