Ad is loading...
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$18.88
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$78.00
Change+$0.18 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.13B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 62.1B vs. DEMCX (5.17B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWHX (1.12) vs DEMCX (1.06). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.30 vs. DEMCX (0.78). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.91 vs. DEMCX (32.26).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.505 | 2.605 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 62.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.12 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.78 | 3.30 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 16.46 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.26 | 39.91 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...