Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$24.34
Change+$0.11 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.52B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.01
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.94B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.9B vs. DEMCX (6.52B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWHX (0.99) vs DEMCX (0.84). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.51 vs. RNWHX (9.21). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.53 vs. RNWHX (29.76).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.860 | 15.772 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.52B | 69.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.99 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.51 | 9.21 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.42 | 40.65 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.53 | 29.76 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement