Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. DEMCX (12.9B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMCX (7.36) vs RNWHX (1.14). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (30 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). DEMCX (2.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DEMCX (5.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 174.71 vs. RNWHX (19.18). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 191.38 vs. RNWHX (15.55).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.72 | 299% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 0.72 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 101.565 | 12.705 | 799% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 90.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.36 | 1.14 | 642% |
| Returns for 1 year | 174.71 | 19.18 | 911% |
| Returns for 3 years | 294.21 | 43.72 | 673% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.38 | 15.55 | 1,231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 444.41 | 107.10 | 415% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement