Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMRX vs RNWHX
DEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMRX vs RNWHX
DEMRX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMRX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMRX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. DEMRX (15.3B). DEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMRX (7.56) vs RNWHX (1.15). DEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMRX (17 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). DEMRX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DEMRX (5.00). DEMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: DEMRX (0) vs RNWHX (250). DEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 212.19 vs. RNWHX (21.66). DEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 220.48 vs. RNWHX (15.07).
| DEMRX | RNWHX | DEMRX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.72 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.72 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 125.412 | 14.413 | 870% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.3B | 90.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.56 | 1.15 | 659% |
| Returns for 1 year | 212.19 | 21.66 | 980% |
| Returns for 3 years | 367.99 | 49.13 | 749% |
| Returns for 5 years | 220.48 | 15.07 | 1,463% |
| Returns for 10 years | 561.07 | 115.86 | 484% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement