Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEOPX vs FSMDX
DEOPX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DEOPX vs FSMDX
Davenport Equity Opportunities
Price$25.39
Change+$0.18 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets929.36M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.98
Change+$0.22 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
DEOPX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEOPX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEOPX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. DEOPX (929M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DEOPX: FSMDX (1.31) vs DEOPX (0.00). DEOPX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DEOPX (15 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). DEOPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DEOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEOPX: FSMDX (0) vs DEOPX (5000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.46 vs. DEOPX (12.39). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 78.71 vs. DEOPX (32.73).
| DEOPX | FSMDX | DEOPX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 3,520% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 3,520% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.044 | 6.803 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 929M | 42.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.39 | 16.46 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.23 | 48.44 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.73 | 78.71 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.81 | 123.56 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement