Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEOPX vs FSMDX
DEOPX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DEOPX vs FSMDX
DEOPX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEOPX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEOPX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. DEOPX (735M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DEOPX: FSMDX (0.75) vs DEOPX (0.03). DEOPX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DEOPX (16 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). DEOPX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DEOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEOPX: FSMDX (0) vs DEOPX (5000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.23 vs. DEOPX (-5.77). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. DEOPX (-12.32).
| DEOPX | FSMDX | DEOPX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.03 | 3,440% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.03 | 3,440% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.065 | 16.030 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 735M | 53.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.75 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.77 | 18.23 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 55.83 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.32 | 40.07 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.19 | 163.52 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers