| DFAS | QSML | DFAS / QSML | |
| Gain YTD | 16.190 | 15.353 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 15.4B | 12.5M | 123,200% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 0.38 | 68% |
| Turnover | 6.00 | 85.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 0.97 | 0.51 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 3 years | - |
| DFAS | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ITDH | 42.93 | 0.37 | +0.87% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF | |||
| DFIS | 37.12 | 0.25 | +0.68% |
| Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | |||
| QGRD | 29.32 | 0.18 | +0.62% |
| Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | |||
| PMNV | 26.33 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November | |||
| BKUI | 49.55 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSML has been loosely correlated with GTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSML jumps, then GTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QSML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QSML | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| GTM - QSML | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NXDR - QSML | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| MZTI - QSML | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.54% | ||
| XPOF - QSML | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| FLYW - QSML | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||