Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs SMDV
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMDV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$55.37
Change-$0.25 (-0.45%)
Volume$400
Net Assets11.08B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$66.11
Change-$0.42 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.71M
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMDV commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and SMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.1B vs. SMDV (658M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than SMDV: DFAT (0.693) vs SMDV (-0.528). DFAT was incepted earlier than SMDV: DFAT (27 years) vs SMDV (10 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than SMDV (0.40). SMDV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | SMDV | DFAT / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 0.693 | -0.528 | -131% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 658M | 1,687% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.40 | 70% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 44.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 2.68 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +1.26% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| UBSI - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| AUB - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| FRME - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| NBTB - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||