Ad is loading...
DFAT vs SMDV
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMDV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$48.41
Change-$4.05 (-7.72%)
Volume$1.57M
Net Assets10.34B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$63.07
Change-$3.12 (-4.71%)
Volume$47.17K
Net Assets681.12M
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMDV commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a StrongBuy and SMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.3B vs. SMDV (681M). SMDV has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: SMDV (-6.246) vs DFAT (-12.761). DFAT was incepted earlier than SMDV: DFAT (26 years) vs SMDV (10 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than SMDV (0.40). SMDV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | SMDV | DFAT / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | -12.761 | -6.246 | 204% |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 681M | 1,512% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.40 | 70% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 44.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 2.88 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 15 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -7.72% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -10.86% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.97% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -11.23% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -16.84% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.61% | ||
More | ||||
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | -4.71% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | -8.81% | ||
| UBSI - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | -6.83% | ||
| FRME - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -8.93% | ||
| AUB - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -11.02% | ||
| STBA - SMDV | 85% Closely correlated | -6.83% | ||
More | ||||