Ad is loading...
DFAT vs SMDV
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMDV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$55.24
Change-$1.30 (-2.30%)
Volume$291.12K
Net Assets10.72B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$68.59
Change-$0.84 (-1.21%)
Volume$53.71K
Net Assets715.19M
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMDV commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and SMDV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.7B vs. SMDV (715M). SMDV has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: SMDV (1.360) vs DFAT (-0.755). DFAT was incepted earlier than SMDV: DFAT (26 years) vs SMDV (10 years). SMDV has a higher turnover DFAT (3.00) vs DFAT (3.00).
| DFAT | SMDV | DFAT / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | -0.755 | 1.360 | -56% |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 715M | 1,497% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 33.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 2.74 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -2.30% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -5.26% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| UBSI - SMDV | 88% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| FRME - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AUB - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -4.08% | ||
| STBA - SMDV | 85% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||