Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFCMX vs FCSTX
DFCMX vs FCSTX Comparison
Open Charts DFCMX vs FCSTX
DFCMX vs FCSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFCMX vs. FCSTX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFCMX is a Hold and FCSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFCMX has more cash in the bank: 919M vs. FCSTX (662M). DFCMX (2.42) and FCSTX (2.40) have matching dividends . DFCMX was incepted earlier than FCSTX: DFCMX (19 years) vs FCSTX (21 years). FCSTX (0.30) is less costly to investors than DFCMX (0.20). DFCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. FCSTX (15.00). DFCMX (0) and FCSTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.95 vs. FCSTX (1.25). DFCMX return over 5 years is better than : 8.43 vs. FCSTX (5.24).
| DFCMX | FCSTX | DFCMX / FCSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.30 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.30 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.316 | 0.287 | 459% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 919M | 662M | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 2.40 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 1.25 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.57 | 9.59 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.43 | 5.24 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.50 | 14.31 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement