Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFCMX vs FCSTX
DFCMX vs FCSTX Comparison
Open Charts DFCMX vs FCSTX
DFCMX vs FCSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFCMX vs. FCSTX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFCMX is a Hold and FCSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFCMX has more cash in the bank: 908M vs. FCSTX (645M). DFCMX pays higher dividends than FCSTX: DFCMX (2.48) vs FCSTX (2.30). DFCMX was incepted earlier than FCSTX: DFCMX (19 years) vs FCSTX (21 years). FCSTX (0.30) is less costly to investors than DFCMX (0.20). DFCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. FCSTX (15.00). DFCMX (0) and FCSTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. DFCMX (2.60). DFCMX return over 5 years is better than : 8.10 vs. FCSTX (5.90).
| DFCMX | FCSTX | DFCMX / FCSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.30 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.30 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.027 | 0.601 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 908M | 645M | 141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 3.61 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.78 | 10.07 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.10 | 5.90 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.19 | 15.02 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers