Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFCX vs FSRBX
DFFCX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts DFFCX vs FSRBX
DFFCX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFCX vs. FSRBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFCX is a Hold and FSRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFCX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. FSRBX (515M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than DFFCX: FSRBX (1.95) vs DFFCX (0.57). DFFCX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: DFFCX (29 years) vs FSRBX (40 years). DFFCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.69). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DFFCX (10.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DFFCX: FSRBX (0) vs DFFCX (1000). FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.79 vs. DFFCX (12.20). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 56.94 vs. DFFCX (46.95).
| DFFCX | FSRBX | DFFCX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.69 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.69 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.938 | 13.600 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 515M | 231% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.95 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.20 | 22.79 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.04 | 83.57 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.95 | 56.94 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.65 | 86.47 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers