Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFCX vs FSRBX
DFFCX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts DFFCX vs FSRBX
DFFCX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFCX vs. FSRBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFCX is a Buy and FSRBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFCX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. FSRBX (452M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than DFFCX: FSRBX (2.16) vs DFFCX (0.63). DFFCX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: DFFCX (29 years) vs FSRBX (40 years). DFFCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.69). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. DFFCX (10.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DFFCX: FSRBX (0) vs DFFCX (1000). FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.80 vs. DFFCX (9.39). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.54 vs. DFFCX (33.02).
| DFFCX | FSRBX | DFFCX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.69 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.69 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.884 | 8.939 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 452M | 248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.16 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 25.80 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.99 | 92.19 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.02 | 40.54 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.54 | 80.70 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement