Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFGX vs LUSNX
DFFGX vs LUSNX Comparison
Open Charts DFFGX vs LUSNX
DFFGX vs LUSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFGX vs. LUSNX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFGX is a Hold and LUSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUSNX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. DFFGX (1.8B). LUSNX pays higher dividends than DFFGX: LUSNX (4.01) vs DFFGX (3.76). DFFGX was incepted earlier than LUSNX: DFFGX (39 years) vs LUSNX (7 years). LUSNX (0.54) is less costly to investors than DFFGX (0.17). LUSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. DFFGX (63.00). DFFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LUSNX: DFFGX (0) vs LUSNX (1500). DFFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.10 vs. LUSNX (2.90). LUSNX return over 5 years is better than : 18.36 vs. DFFGX (10.91).
| DFFGX | LUSNX | DFFGX / LUSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.54 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.54 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.889 | 1.458 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 16.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 4.01 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 2.90 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.35 | 15.00 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.91 | 18.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement