Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs PSCMX
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$16.22
Change+$0.26 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.29M
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. PSCMX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and PSCMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. PSCMX (247M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than PSCMX: DFFVX (1.62) vs PSCMX (0.96). DFFVX was incepted earlier than PSCMX: DFFVX (25 years) vs PSCMX (12 years). PSCMX (0.78) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs PSCMX (500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.71 vs. PSCMX (-1.39). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 105.55 vs. PSCMX (93.56).
| DFFVX | PSCMX | DFFVX / PSCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.78 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.78 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.705 | -5.674 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 247M | 5,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.96 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | -1.39 | -340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.91 | 11.97 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.55 | 93.56 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.25 | 6.65 | 710% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement