Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$33.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.88B
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$16.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.28M
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. PSCMX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and PSCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. PSCMX (253M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than PSCMX: DFFVX (1.62) vs PSCMX (0.93). DFFVX was incepted earlier than PSCMX: DFFVX (25 years) vs PSCMX (12 years). PSCMX (0.76) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs PSCMX (500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.79 vs. PSCMX (0.17). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 88.69 vs. PSCMX (76.88).
| DFFVX | PSCMX | DFFVX / PSCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.76 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.075 | -3.073 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 253M | 5,099% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.93 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.79 | 0.17 | 5,260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.18 | 6.79 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.69 | 76.88 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.38 | 13.61 | 436% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers