Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$32.47
Change+$0.53 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.39B
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$16.18
Change+$0.28 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.77M
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. PSCMX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Hold and PSCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. PSCMX (259M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than PSCMX: DFFVX (1.62) vs PSCMX (0.96). DFFVX was incepted earlier than PSCMX: DFFVX (25 years) vs PSCMX (12 years). PSCMX (0.78) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs PSCMX (500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.04 vs. PSCMX (-4.05). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 87.04 vs. PSCMX (80.45).
| DFFVX | PSCMX | DFFVX / PSCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.78 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.78 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.114 | -6.028 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 259M | 4,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.96 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.04 | -4.05 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.40 | 0.47 | 2,868% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.04 | 80.45 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.52 | 7.67 | 619% |