Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$34.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.33B
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
Price$17.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.85M
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. PSCMX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and PSCMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. PSCMX (264M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than PSCMX: DFFVX (1.63) vs PSCMX (0.92). DFFVX was incepted earlier than PSCMX: DFFVX (25 years) vs PSCMX (12 years). PSCMX (0.76) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs PSCMX (500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.08 vs. PSCMX (-0.78). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 106.45 vs. PSCMX (98.62).
| DFFVX | PSCMX | DFFVX / PSCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.76 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.978 | 1.182 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.3B | 264M | 5,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.92 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | -0.78 | -903% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.82 | 21.18 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.45 | 98.62 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.64 | 16.64 | 376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement