Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs PSCMX
DFFVX vs PSCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. PSCMX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Hold and PSCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. PSCMX (307M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than PSCMX: DFFVX (1.51) vs PSCMX (1.32). DFFVX was incepted earlier than PSCMX: DFFVX (26 years) vs PSCMX (13 years). PSCMX (0.76) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). PSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. DFFVX (10.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSCMX: DFFVX (0) vs PSCMX (500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.56 vs. PSCMX (25.25). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 51.97 vs. PSCMX (29.56).
| DFFVX | PSCMX | DFFVX / PSCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.76 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.727 | 17.402 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 307M | 5,212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.32 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.56 | 25.25 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.26 | 41.81 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.97 | 29.56 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.36 | 49.91 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers