Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFMAX vs RWMFX
DFMAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts DFMAX vs RWMFX
DFMAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFMAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFMAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. DFMAX (132M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than DFMAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs DFMAX (0.70). DFMAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: DFMAX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). DFMAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. DFMAX (19.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DFMAX: RWMFX (250) vs DFMAX (2500). DFMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.75 vs. RWMFX (1.33). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. DFMAX (15.92).
| DFMAX | RWMFX | DFMAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.31 | 371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.31 | 406% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.115 | 3.404 | 209% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.41 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 1.33 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.86 | 29.00 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.92 | 26.42 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.65 | 80.74 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers