DFMTF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
47.28M
FSUMF
Price
$12.51
Change
-$0.23 (-1.81%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
45.07B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DFMTF vs FSUMF

Header iconDFMTF vs FSUMF Comparison
Open Charts DFMTF vs FSUMFBanner chart's image
Defense Metals
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$87.84K
Capitalization47.28M
FORTESCUE
Price$12.51
Change-$0.23 (-1.81%)
Volume$10.98K
Capitalization45.07B
DFMTF vs FSUMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DFMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DFMTF vs. FSUMF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFMTF is a Hold and FSUMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DFMTF: $0.15 vs. FSUMF: $12.51)
Brand notoriety: DFMTF and FSUMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DFMTF: 69% vs. FSUMF: 236%
Market capitalization -- DFMTF: $47.28M vs. FSUMF: $45.07B
DFMTF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $47.28M. FSUMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $45.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DFMTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DFMTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the long-term than DFMTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DFMTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSUMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DFMTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the short-term than DFMTF.

Price Growth

DFMTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.63% price change this week, while FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($45.1B) has a higher market cap than DFMTF($47.3M). FSUMF YTD gains are higher at: 8.783 vs. DFMTF (-6.722). FSUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.99B vs. DFMTF (-4.84M). FSUMF has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. DFMTF (3.91M). FSUMF has higher revenues than DFMTF: FSUMF (17B) vs DFMTF (0).
DFMTFFSUMFDFMTF / FSUMF
Capitalization47.3M45.1B0%
EBITDA-4.84M9.99B-0%
Gain YTD-6.7228.783-77%
P/E RatioN/A7.66-
Revenue017B-
Total Cash3.91M5.22B0%
Total DebtN/A6.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DFMTF vs FSUMF: Fundamental Ratings
DFMTF
FSUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6230
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DFMTF (35). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DFMTF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as DFMTF (100). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to DFMTF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as DFMTF (100). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to DFMTF’s over the last 12 months.

DFMTF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (42). This means that DFMTF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DFMTF (100). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew significantly faster than DFMTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFMTFFSUMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DFMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RZLT6.300.43
+7.33%
Rezolute
KAVL0.480.01
+2.35%
Kaival Brands Innovations Group
WAFD29.740.21
+0.71%
WaFd
BAP235.85-1.27
-0.54%
Credicorp Ltd
ZURA1.64-0.04
-2.38%
Zura Bio Limited

DFMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DFMTF and PRZFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFMTF and PRZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DFMTF
1D Price
Change %
DFMTF100%
-4.06%
PRZFF - DFMTF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MALRY - DFMTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
VDOMF - DFMTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUMF - DFMTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
DRRSF - DFMTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.10%
More

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
-1.81%
FSUGY - FSUMF
68%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
RIO - FSUMF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
BHP - FSUMF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
VALE - FSUMF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
FCX - FSUMF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
More