Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs LMASX
DFSTX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs LMASX
DFSTX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. LMASX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and LMASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. LMASX (729M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than LMASX: DFSTX (0.95) vs LMASX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than LMASX: DFSTX (34 years) vs LMASX (41 years). LMASX (1.89) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMASX: DFSTX (0) vs LMASX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.88 vs. LMASX (14.62). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.54 vs. LMASX (-18.69).
| DFSTX | LMASX | DFSTX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.85 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.89 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.817 | 12.651 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 729M | 2,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.88 | 14.62 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.40 | 9.80 | 514% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.54 | -18.69 | -212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.98 | 14.78 | 798% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement