Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs LMNSX
DFSTX vs LMNSX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs LMNSX
DFSTX vs LMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. LMNSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Hold and LMNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. LMNSX (730M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: DFSTX (0.95) vs LMNSX (0.29). DFSTX was incepted earlier than LMNSX: DFSTX (34 years) vs LMNSX (32 years). LMNSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNSX: DFSTX (0) vs LMNSX (1000000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.05 vs. LMNSX (22.36). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.03 vs. LMNSX (-1.34).
| DFSTX | LMNSX | DFSTX / LMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.85 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.86 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.971 | 13.174 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 730M | 2,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.29 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.05 | 22.36 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.94 | 28.17 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.03 | -1.34 | -2,687% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.59 | 68.92 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement