Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs NMSAX
DFSTX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs NMSAX
DFSTX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.2B vs. NMSAX (2.57B). DFSTX (0.95) and NMSAX (0.91) have matching dividends . DFSTX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: DFSTX (34 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: DFSTX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.03 vs. NMSAX (19.77). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 30.43 vs. NMSAX (-16.57).
| DFSTX | NMSAX | DFSTX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.45 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.45 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.826 | 15.164 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.2B | 2.57B | 746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.03 | 19.77 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.77 | 11.86 | 453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.43 | -16.57 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.47 | 24.23 | 460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement