Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs NMSAX
DFSTX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs NMSAX
DFSTX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. NMSAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a StrongBuy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.4B vs. NMSAX (2.53B). DFSTX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: DFSTX (0.97) vs NMSAX (0.90). DFSTX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: DFSTX (35 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: DFSTX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.08 vs. NMSAX (4.22). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.53 vs. NMSAX (-15.32).
| DFSTX | NMSAX | DFSTX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.45 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.45 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.572 | 10.235 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4B | 2.53B | 767% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.90 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.08 | 4.22 | 404% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 8.54 | 627% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.53 | -15.32 | -238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.94 | 16.39 | 677% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement