Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WHGCX
DFSTX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WHGCX
DFSTX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WHGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a StrongBuy and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.4B vs. WHGCX (773M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: DFSTX (0.97) vs WHGCX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: DFSTX (35 years) vs WHGCX (7 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: DFSTX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.08 vs. WHGCX (-1.58). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.53 vs. WHGCX (1.94).
| DFSTX | WHGCX | DFSTX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.79 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.93 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.572 | 9.552 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4B | 773M | 2,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.08 | -1.58 | -1,080% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 10.64 | 503% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.53 | 1.94 | 1,879% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement