Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WHGSX
DFSTX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WHGSX
DFSTX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WHGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. WHGSX (877M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: DFSTX (0.95) vs WHGSX (0.64). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: DFSTX (34 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: DFSTX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.91 vs. WHGSX (7.06). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.10 vs. WHGSX (9.92).
| DFSTX | WHGSX | DFSTX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.92 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.06 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.072 | 14.974 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 877M | 2,258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.64 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.91 | 7.06 | 353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.63 | 15.03 | 330% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.10 | 9.92 | 394% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.08 | 66.74 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers