Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WMKSX
DFSTX vs WMKSX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WMKSX
DFSTX vs WMKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WMKSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a StrongBuy and WMKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.4B vs. WMKSX (170M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WMKSX: DFSTX (0.97) vs WMKSX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WMKSX: DFSTX (35 years) vs WMKSX (33 years). WMKSX (1.33) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). WMKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKSX: DFSTX (0) vs WMKSX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.08 vs. WMKSX (-4.84). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.53 vs. WMKSX (-12.44).
| DFSTX | WMKSX | DFSTX / WMKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.33 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.33 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.572 | 15.753 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4B | 170M | 11,412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.08 | -4.84 | -353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 32.44 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.53 | -12.44 | -294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.94 | 33.39 | 332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers