Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WMKSX
DFSTX vs WMKSX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WMKSX
DFSTX vs WMKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WMKSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Buy and WMKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.2B vs. WMKSX (172M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WMKSX: DFSTX (0.95) vs WMKSX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WMKSX: DFSTX (34 years) vs WMKSX (32 years). WMKSX (1.33) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). WMKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKSX: DFSTX (0) vs WMKSX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.03 vs. WMKSX (8.18). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 30.43 vs. WMKSX (-9.66).
| DFSTX | WMKSX | DFSTX / WMKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.33 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.33 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.826 | 15.000 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.2B | 172M | 11,163% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.03 | 8.18 | 367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.77 | 39.18 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.43 | -9.66 | -315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.47 | 37.04 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement