Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSTX vs WMKSX
DFSTX vs WMKSX Comparison
Open Charts DFSTX vs WMKSX
DFSTX vs WMKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSTX vs. WMKSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSTX is a Buy and WMKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFSTX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. WMKSX (178M). DFSTX pays higher dividends than WMKSX: DFSTX (0.95) vs WMKSX (0.00). DFSTX was incepted earlier than WMKSX: DFSTX (34 years) vs WMKSX (33 years). WMKSX (1.33) is less costly to investors than DFSTX (0.28). WMKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. DFSTX (5.00). DFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKSX: DFSTX (0) vs WMKSX (1000). DFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.91 vs. WMKSX (6.59). DFSTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.10 vs. WMKSX (-3.48).
| DFSTX | WMKSX | DFSTX / WMKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 1.33 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.33 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.072 | 20.753 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 178M | 11,124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.91 | 6.59 | 378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.63 | 39.36 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.10 | -3.48 | -1,124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.08 | 40.26 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers