DFUS
Price
$84.94
Change
-$0.14 (-0.16%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Net Assets
21.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPY
Price
$776.34
Change
-$1.54 (-0.20%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Net Assets
824B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DFUS vs SPY

DFUS vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 15, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) vs. State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)

Key Takeaways

  • DFUS provides broad exposure to the U.S. equity market across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks with approximately 2,200 holdings, while SPY concentrates on the 500 largest U.S. companies in the S&P 500 Index.
  • Both exchange-traded funds (ETFs) maintain low expense ratios of 0.09 percent, making them cost-efficient options for core equity allocations.
  • DFUS employs a systematic, market-capitalization-weighted strategy with active security selection elements from Dimensional Fund Advisors, whereas SPY follows a strict passive replication of the S&P 500 Index as a unit investment trust.
  • Sector allocations in both funds are dominated by technology, though DFUS offers greater diversification through inclusion of smaller companies that can influence relative performance during market rotations.
  • Liquidity profiles differ significantly, with SPY exhibiting exceptionally high trading volume and tight spreads due to its long-standing market presence and status as one of the most widely used equity benchmarks.
  • In the current environment of concentrated mega-cap leadership, DFUS's broader holdings base may provide different risk-return characteristics compared to SPY's large-cap focus during periods of sector or size rotation.

Introduction

Investors seeking core U.S. equity exposure frequently evaluate Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) as complementary or alternative holdings within diversified portfolios. These ETFs do not compete directly in every respect; instead, they represent distinct approaches to capturing U.S. market returns. DFUS emphasizes comprehensive market coverage, while SPY delivers targeted exposure to large-capitalization leaders. The comparison remains relevant amid ongoing discussions around market concentration, cost efficiency, and the role of broad versus benchmark-specific strategies in long-term asset allocation.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) Overview

The Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) seeks to provide exposure to a wide spectrum of U.S. equities by investing at least 80 percent of assets in securities of U.S. companies. The fund utilizes a systematic, market-capitalization-weighted approach informed by Dimensional's research on factors such as size, value, and profitability. It holds approximately 2,200 securities spanning large-, mid-, and small-capitalization segments. Top holdings typically include major technology names such as Apple Inc. and NVIDIA Corp., though concentration in the largest positions remains moderate due to the expansive universe. Sector allocations feature significant weight in technology, followed by financial services and consumer cyclical areas. The expense ratio stands at 0.09 percent. DFUS operates as a passively managed ETF with systematic tilts rather than strict index replication, distinguishing it through its methodology and broader diversification profile.

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Overview

The State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) aims to deliver investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P 500 Index before expenses. Launched in 1993, it remains one of the most established exchange-traded products and holds approximately 500 large-capitalization U.S. stocks selected by the index committee based on market size, liquidity, and sector representation. Top holdings are led by technology giants including NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Amazon.com Inc. Sector exposure shows pronounced weighting toward information technology. The expense ratio is 0.0945 percent. SPY is structured as a unit investment trust, which imposes certain operational constraints compared to other ETF formats but supports its benchmark-tracking objective and high liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market continues to reflect themes of technological innovation, artificial intelligence adoption, and earnings growth among large-capitalization companies. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles, and capital allocation trends influence both broad-market and large-cap segments. Regulatory developments around technology platforms and potential shifts in monetary policy represent ongoing considerations. Sector risks center on valuation levels in high-growth areas and the potential for rotation toward value or smaller-capitalization stocks if economic conditions evolve. Capital flows into equity ETFs remain robust, supporting liquidity across products that track domestic equities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have benefited from strength in technology and growth-oriented segments, though their positioning produces distinct behavior. SPY's concentration in mega-capitalization names can amplify returns during periods of leadership by the largest companies while also increasing sensitivity to shifts affecting those specific holdings. DFUS, with its inclusion of mid- and small-capitalization securities, may exhibit different volatility characteristics and capture opportunities arising from broader market participation. Relative performance often ties to sector rotation dynamics, earnings momentum in key industries, and macroeconomic variables such as interest rates or geopolitical developments. Over longer horizons, the structural difference in holdings breadth influences how each fund responds to changes in market leadership.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into holdings like DFUS or SPY may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) for investors prioritizing comprehensive diversification across market capitalizations at a comparable cost structure. SPY remains highly competitive for those seeking precise large-cap benchmark exposure and superior liquidity. The assessment rests on differences in holdings breadth, sector balance, and risk profile rather than short-term momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DFUS vs. SPY commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFUS is a StrongBuy and SPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 824B vs. DFUS (21.8B). DFUS (15.071) and SPY (14.451) have matching annual dividend yield . DFUS was incepted earlier than SPY: DFUS (25 years) vs SPY (34 years). DFUS (0.09) and SPY (0.09) have comparable expense ratios . DFUS (3.00) and SPY (3.00) have matching turnover.
DFUSSPYDFUS / SPY
Gain YTD15.07114.451104%
Net Assets21.8B824B3%
Total Expense Ratio0.090.0995%
Turnover3.003.00100%
Yield0.861.0186%
Fund Existence25 years34 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFUSSPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DFUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDGT123.400.45
+0.37%
iShares U.S. Digital Infras & RE ETF
DUKX28.94-0.04
-0.15%
Ocean Park International ETF
NVDL36.71-0.08
-0.22%
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
VTN11.23-0.03
-0.27%
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals
QQWZ29.02-0.08
-0.27%
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq100RotatorETF

DFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFUS has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DFUS jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DFUS
1D Price
Change %
DFUS100%
-0.16%
AVGO - DFUS
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.94%
MSFT - DFUS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
AAPL - DFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
AMZN - DFUS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
META - DFUS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More

SPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPY
1D Price
Change %
SPY100%
-0.20%
MSFT - SPY
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
AAPL - SPY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
AVGO - SPY
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.94%
AMZN - SPY
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
META - SPY
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More