DGP
Price
$133.95
Change
+$3.35 (+2.57%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:53 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
99.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UGL
Price
$45.10
Change
+$0.99 (+2.24%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
628.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DGP vs UGL

DGP vs UGL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? DB Gold Double Long ETN (DGP) vs. ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL)

Key Takeaways

  • DGP and UGL both deliver 2x daily leveraged exposure to gold prices but differ in structure, with DGP as an exchange-traded note (ETN) and UGL as a commodity pool exchange-traded fund (ETF).
  • DGP tracks the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%) with a lower expense ratio of 0.75%, while UGL tracks the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (2x) at 0.95%.
  • Both products maintain minimal holdings focused on gold futures or derivatives, resulting in concentrated exposure to commodity price movements rather than diversified equity or sector allocations.
  • Structural distinctions include potential issuer credit risk in the ETN format of DGP versus the tax reporting implications (Schedule K-1) associated with UGL's commodity pool structure.
  • Investors seeking gold leverage must weigh cost efficiency against liquidity profiles and counterparty considerations in the current environment of fluctuating interest rates and commodity demand.
  • Relative positioning favors short-term tactical use due to daily reset mechanics, compounding effects, and amplified volatility in both funds during gold price cycles.

Introduction

DB Gold Double Long ETN (DGP) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) represent two approaches to leveraged gold exposure within the commodities segment. They do not compete directly with broad equity or sector ETFs but serve investors pursuing amplified daily returns tied to gold futures performance. Both target similar goals of enhanced commodity beta, yet structural and cost differences create distinct risk and efficiency profiles suitable for tactical allocation decisions in varying macroeconomic conditions.

DB Gold Double Long ETN (DGP) Overview

The DB Gold Double Long ETN (DGP) seeks to deliver twice the daily performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return, which optimizes gold futures contract selection to mitigate contango effects. Issued by Deutsche Bank AG since February 2008, it operates as an exchange-traded note (ETN) with a single underlying exposure rather than multiple holdings. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As an ETN, it carries issuer credit risk alongside market exposure. The strategy remains passive and fully unhedged to gold futures movements, with no sector allocations beyond the commodity itself. Distinguishing features include the optimized yield index methodology and the lower fee structure relative to peers.

ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) Overview

ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) targets two times (2x) the daily performance of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex, which reflects the price of gold futures contracts. Launched by ProShares in December 2008, the fund functions as a commodity pool ETF using derivatives such as futures and swaps to achieve leverage. It maintains effectively one primary exposure vehicle with an expense ratio of 0.95%. The structure avoids direct ETN credit risk but requires Schedule K-1 tax reporting for investors. The passive approach resets daily, emphasizing short-term alignment with gold price movements without traditional equity sector breakdowns or multi-asset diversification.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the leveraged commodities space, where gold serves as a hedge against inflation, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical uncertainty. Macroeconomic drivers include central bank monetary policy, real interest rate expectations, and global demand for safe-haven assets. Capital flows into gold-related products often accelerate during periods of economic expansion or market volatility. Regulatory developments around derivatives and commodity trading remain stable, though overall sector risks encompass contango-related decay in futures rolls and amplified sensitivity to gold price swings. Investors monitor these factors for positioning in environments favoring or disfavoring precious metals exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both DGP and UGL have exhibited magnified movements aligned with gold price trends, driven by commodity momentum and macroeconomic shifts such as interest rate expectations. The daily leverage reset creates compounding effects that can enhance or erode returns over multi-day periods depending on volatility and trend consistency. DGP benefits from its lower expense ratio in prolonged holding scenarios, while UGL offers potentially greater liquidity for active traders. Relative positioning highlights trade-offs between cost efficiency in the ETN and structural features of the ETF format, with both funds demonstrating heightened volatility compared to unleveraged gold vehicles during sector rotations or earnings-influenced commodity cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, optimized futures methodology, and cost efficiency within the leveraged gold category, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to DGP for investors prioritizing fee minimization alongside comparable exposure profiles. UGL remains competitive due to its ETF structure and liquidity characteristics, making either suitable depending on specific risk tolerance and tax considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DGP vs. UGL commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGP is a Hold and UGL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UGL has more net assets: 628M vs. DGP (99.8M). DGP has a higher annual dividend yield than UGL: DGP (-18.887) vs UGL (-20.551). DGP was incepted earlier than UGL: DGP (18 years) vs UGL (18 years).
DGPUGLDGP / UGL
Gain YTD-18.887-20.55192%
Net Assets99.8M628M16%
Total Expense RatioN/A1.19-
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence18 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DGPUGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UGL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIDVX15.65N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val A
SBEMX14.79N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Instl
PRECX20.14N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Blend C
FPUKX28.25N/A
N/A
Fidelity Puritan K
LRSYX23.63N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value I