DGRW vs SEIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGRW is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DGRW | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 48% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSMS | 23.52 | 0.04 | +0.19% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2028 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| XDAT | 26.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin Exponential Data ETF | |||
| DURA | 33.65 | N/A | -0.01% |
| VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF | |||
| EYLD | 32.39 | -0.39 | -1.19% |
| Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| FAS | 170.23 | -6.53 | -3.69% |
| Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | |||
DGRW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGRW has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DGRW jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DGRW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGRW | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| TROW - DGRW | 70% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| SEIC - DGRW | 70% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| HD - DGRW | 69% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| BCPC - DGRW | 67% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| TXN - DGRW | 67% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | -2.42% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 68% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| JHG - SEIC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| APAM - SEIC | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| AMG - SEIC | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||