DGRW vs SEIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGRW is a Buy and SEIC is a Buy.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DGRW | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 2 days ago 47% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BAB | 26.90 | 0.18 | +0.67% |
| Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| RMM | 14.39 | 0.06 | +0.42% |
| RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund | |||
| GNT | 6.01 | -0.08 | -1.31% |
| GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust | |||
| SHUS | 41.17 | -1.48 | -3.47% |
| Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF | |||
| DGRW | 77.28 | -3.08 | -3.83% |
| WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Gr ETF | |||
DGRW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGRW has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DGRW jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DGRW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGRW | 100% | -3.83% | ||
| TROW - DGRW | 70% Closely correlated | -8.18% | ||
| SEIC - DGRW | 70% Closely correlated | -5.28% | ||
| HD - DGRW | 69% Closely correlated | -4.04% | ||
| BCPC - DGRW | 67% Closely correlated | -4.27% | ||
| TXN - DGRW | 67% Closely correlated | -7.85% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | -5.28% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 70% Closely correlated | -8.18% | ||
| JHG - SEIC | 68% Closely correlated | -11.05% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 68% Closely correlated | -7.41% | ||
| AMG - SEIC | 66% Closely correlated | -8.39% | ||
| IVZ - SEIC | 65% Loosely correlated | -11.85% | ||
More | ||||