DGS | EEMV | DGS / EEMV | |
Gain YTD | 3.113 | 8.313 | 37% |
Net Assets | 1.97B | 4.15B | 47% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 53.00 | 58.00 | 91% |
Yield | 4.32 | 2.70 | 160% |
Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
DGS | EEMV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago80% | 8 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGS has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGS jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMV has been loosely correlated with YUMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMV jumps, then YUMC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV | 100% | +0.12% | ||
YUMC - EEMV | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
TEL - EEMV | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
ZTO - EEMV | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
BGNE - EEMV | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
BAP - EEMV | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.01% | ||
More |