Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIFAX vs HBLAX
DIFAX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts DIFAX vs HBLAX
DIFAX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIFAX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIFAX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. DIFAX (1.75B). DIFAX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: DIFAX (5.29) vs HBLAX (3.13). DIFAX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: DIFAX (20 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). DIFAX (0.95) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. DIFAX (43.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than DIFAX (4%) vs DIFAX (4%). DIFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: DIFAX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to DIFAX: HBLAX (2000) vs DIFAX (250). DIFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. HBLAX (1.22). DIFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| DIFAX | HBLAX | DIFAX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.89 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.251 | 4.076 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 77% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 10.9B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.29 | 3.13 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 1.22 | 542% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.83 | 19.75 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | 4.63 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.82 | 39.00 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement