Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIFDX vs HBLAX
DIFDX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts DIFDX vs HBLAX
DIFDX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIFDX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIFDX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. DIFDX (1.75B). DIFDX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: DIFDX (4.55) vs HBLAX (3.13). DIFDX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: DIFDX (18 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). DIFDX (1.70) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. DIFDX (43.00). DIFDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: DIFDX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). DIFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. HBLAX (1.22). DIFDX return over 5 years is better than : 9.21 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| DIFDX | HBLAX | DIFDX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.89 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.89 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.727 | 4.076 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 10.9B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 3.13 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 1.22 | 477% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.97 | 19.75 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.21 | 4.63 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.09 | 39.00 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement