Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIFDX vs HBLSX
DIFDX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts DIFDX vs HBLSX
DIFDX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIFDX vs. HBLSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIFDX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. DIFDX (1.79B). DIFDX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: DIFDX (4.35) vs HBLSX (3.04). DIFDX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: DIFDX (18 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). DIFDX (1.70) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. DIFDX (43.00). DIFDX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DIFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. HBLSX (5.37). DIFDX return over 5 years is better than : 10.07 vs. HBLSX (5.46).
| DIFDX | HBLSX | DIFDX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.96 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.96 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.241 | 4.611 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 11.1B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.35 | 3.04 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 5.37 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.29 | 17.89 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.07 | 5.46 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.94 | 38.76 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers