Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIFGX vs HBLAX
DIFGX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts DIFGX vs HBLAX
DIFGX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIFGX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIFGX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. DIFGX (1.75B). DIFGX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: DIFGX (5.54) vs HBLAX (3.13). DIFGX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: DIFGX (18 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than DIFGX (0.70). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. DIFGX (43.00). DIFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: DIFGX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). DIFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. HBLAX (1.22). DIFGX return over 5 years is better than : 14.76 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| DIFGX | HBLAX | DIFGX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.89 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.426 | 4.076 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 10.9B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 3.13 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 1.22 | 564% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.80 | 19.75 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.76 | 4.63 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.72 | 39.00 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement