Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DIFGX vs HBLSX
DIFGX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts DIFGX vs HBLSX
DIFGX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DIFGX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIFGX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. DIFGX (1.81B). DIFGX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: DIFGX (5.73) vs HBLSX (3.08). DIFGX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: DIFGX (18 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than DIFGX (0.71). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. DIFGX (43.00). DIFGX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DIFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. HBLSX (6.60). DIFGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.27 vs. HBLSX (5.17).
| DIFGX | HBLSX | DIFGX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.96 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.96 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.689 | 3.264 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 11.2B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.73 | 3.08 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 6.60 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.50 | 20.11 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.27 | 5.17 | 315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.84 | 40.46 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement