DIG
Price
$51.95
Change
+$0.70 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
66.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLPR
Price
$68.81
Change
+$1.53 (+2.27%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:31 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
57.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIG vs MLPR

DIG vs MLPR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra Energy (DIG) vs. ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra Energy (DIG) delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to large-cap U.S. energy companies through an exchange-traded fund (ETF) structure, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) provides 1.5x quarterly leveraged exposure to midstream Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) via an exchange-traded note (ETN).
  • DIG tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Index with daily rebalancing and an expense ratio of 0.95%, whereas MLPR tracks the Alerian MLP Index with quarterly compounding and a higher expense ratio of 1.90%.
  • DIG holds approximately 23-30 equity positions concentrated in integrated oil and gas firms such as Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM) and Chevron Corp (CVX), resulting in 100% energy sector allocation.
  • MLPR is an ETN with no direct holdings, exposing investors to issuer credit risk from UBS, and generates variable quarterly coupons tied to MLP distributions.
  • Both products offer amplified energy sector exposure but differ significantly in leverage mechanics, rebalancing frequency, structural risks, and cost efficiency.
  • DIG generally presents a lower-cost, ETF-based approach to broad energy equities, while MLPR emphasizes MLP income characteristics with added leverage and ETN-specific considerations.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra Energy (DIG) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) both target leveraged returns within the energy sector but pursue distinct strategies. DIG amplifies daily performance of major oil and gas equities, while MLPR focuses on leveraged midstream MLP returns with quarterly payout features. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they offer alternative leveraged exposure options for investors seeking enhanced energy sector participation. The comparison highlights differences in structure, sub-sector focus, and risk profiles that matter for portfolio construction in varying market environments.

ProShares Ultra Energy (DIG) Overview

ProShares Ultra Energy (DIG) is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P Energy Select Sector Index. The fund maintains approximately 23-30 holdings, with top positions typically including Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM), Chevron Corp (CVX), and other large-cap energy companies. Sector allocation is 100% energy. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passive leveraged product, DIG uses derivatives and daily rebalancing to maintain its 2x target. This structure suits short-term tactical exposure rather than long-term holding due to compounding effects from daily resets.

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) Overview

ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) is a leveraged ETN designed to deliver 1.5 times leveraged long exposure to the compounded quarterly performance of the Alerian MLP Index, less financing costs and fees. As an ETN, the product has zero direct holdings and relies on the creditworthiness of issuer UBS. It features an expense ratio of 1.90% and pays variable quarterly coupons linked to leveraged cash distributions from underlying MLPs. The index focuses on approximately 50 publicly traded energy MLPs involved in midstream activities such as transportation and storage. Quarterly compounding and coupon payments distinguish this product from daily-reset leveraged ETFs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The energy sector encompasses exploration, production, refining, and midstream infrastructure, influenced by commodity price cycles, global supply-demand dynamics, and the ongoing energy transition. MLPs provide tax-advantaged income streams from fee-based midstream assets, while integrated energy equities offer broader exposure to upstream and downstream activities. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, geopolitical developments, and capital allocation between traditional energy and renewables continue to shape sector performance. Regulatory developments around energy infrastructure and tax treatment of MLPs remain relevant considerations for both products.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both funds have exhibited amplified volatility consistent with their leveraged structures. DIG’s daily 2x reset ties its returns closely to movements in large-cap energy equities, potentially benefiting from integrated company earnings and commodity price swings. MLPR’s quarterly 1.5x mechanism and distribution-linked coupons position it to capture MLP-specific income characteristics alongside leveraged price appreciation. Relative positioning depends on preferences for equity versus partnership exposure, daily versus quarterly mechanics, and tolerance for ETN credit risk versus ETF operational features. Volatility differences arise from leverage levels, rebalancing frequency, and underlying asset characteristics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor ProShares Ultra Energy (DIG) in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, ETF structure without issuer credit risk, and broader diversification across energy equities. MLPR’s higher cost and ETN format introduce additional considerations around fees and counterparty exposure, though its quarterly coupon feature may appeal to income-oriented strategies. The assessment remains probabilistic and depends on evolving market conditions, investor objectives, and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DIG vs. MLPR commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIG is a Hold and MLPR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIG has more net assets: 66.7M vs. MLPR (57.3M). DIG has a higher annual dividend yield than MLPR: DIG (42.449) vs MLPR (21.773). DIG was incepted earlier than MLPR: DIG (19 years) vs MLPR (6 years).
DIGMLPRDIG / MLPR
Gain YTD42.44921.773195%
Net Assets66.7M57.3M116%
Total Expense Ratio0.95N/A-
Turnover27.00N/A-
Yield1.629.0018%
Fund Existence19 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIGMLPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLPR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NARCX74.07N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp C
FFGRX35.28N/A
N/A
Emerald Growth Investor
ARVIX16.65N/A
N/A
ARGA International Value Institutional
CNPIX77.34N/A
N/A
Consumer Staples UltraSector ProFund Inv
ANORX21.77N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Growth R

DIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIG has been closely correlated with XOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIG jumps, then XOM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIG
1D Price
Change %
DIG100%
+2.73%
XOM - DIG
91%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
COP - DIG
89%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
CVX - DIG
88%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
EOG - DIG
85%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
DVN - DIG
83%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
More