DIN
Price
$24.35
Change
+$0.32 (+1.33%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
369.57M
41 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$144.40
Change
+$0.21 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.42B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs EAT

Header iconDIN vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs EATBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$24.35
Change+$0.32 (+1.33%)
Volume$5.18K
Capitalization369.57M
Brinker International
Price$144.40
Change+$0.21 (+0.15%)
Volume$6.2K
Capitalization6.42B
DIN vs EAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. EAT commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and EAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (DIN: $24.35 vs. EAT: $144.37)
Brand notoriety: DIN and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 129% vs. EAT: 100%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $369.57M vs. EAT: $6.42B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $369.57M. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $6.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $216.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DIN and EAT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.84% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was -6.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($6.42B) has a higher market cap than DIN($370M). EAT has higher P/E ratio than DIN: EAT (17.35) vs DIN (8.14). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 9.131 vs. DIN (-15.810). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 720M vs. DIN (178M). DIN has more cash in the bank: 194M vs. EAT (18.9M). DIN (1.64B) and EAT (1.69B) have identical debt. EAT has higher revenues than DIN: EAT (5.38B) vs DIN (845M).
DINEATDIN / EAT
Capitalization370M6.42B6%
EBITDA178M720M25%
Gain YTD-15.8109.131-173%
P/E Ratio8.1417.3547%
Revenue845M5.38B16%
Total Cash194M18.9M1,026%
Total Debt1.64B1.69B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
854
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
10011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1372
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2521

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (64). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (55). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (72). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDNGF0.820.01
+1.36%
Midnight Sun Mining Corp
BACHY14.230.01
+0.07%
Bank of China, Ltd.
AGRPY21.34N/A
N/A
Absa Group Ltd.
TOEYF0.13N/A
N/A
Toro Energy Ltd.
CGIUF2.10N/A
N/A
ESR REIT