DIN
Price
$45.17
Change
-$0.52 (-1.14%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
10 days until earnings call
EAT
Price
$48.87
Change
+$0.60 (+1.24%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price DIN vs EAT

Header iconDIN vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs EATBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$45.17
Change-$0.52 (-1.14%)
Volume$97.8K
CapitalizationN/A
Brinker International
Price$48.87
Change+$0.60 (+1.24%)
Volume$329.87K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DIN vs EAT Comparison Chart

Loading...

DINDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
DIN vs. EAT commentary
Apr 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a StrongSell and EAT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2024
Stock price -- (DIN: $45.17 vs. EAT: $48.83)
Brand notoriety: DIN and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 86% vs. EAT: 84%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $698.01M vs. EAT: $2.16B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $698.01M. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $196.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was +7.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for DIN with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for EAT with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($2.16B) has a higher market cap than DIN($698M). EAT has higher P/E ratio than DIN: EAT (14.28) vs DIN (7.26). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 13.085 vs. DIN (-8.023). DIN has less debt than EAT: DIN (1.59B) vs EAT (2.09B).
DINEATDIN / EAT
Capitalization698M2.16B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.02313.085-61%
P/E Ratio7.2614.2851%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.59B2.09B76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8988
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7521

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (9) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (31). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (73). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (89). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DINDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
EATDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYSYX65.750.65
+1.00%
Rydex S&P 500 C
GSWPX23.780.21
+0.89%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P
HDVVX12.120.08
+0.66%
Hartford International Equity R6
UBVCX72.830.04
+0.05%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val C
ENPSX41.00-0.58
-1.39%
ProFunds UltraSector Energy Svc

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
-1.12%
CAKE - DIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
DENN - DIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
EAT - DIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
BLMN - DIN
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
BJRI - DIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More